Probabilities ============== ProvSQL can compute the probability that a query answer holds in a *probabilistic database* :cite:`DBLP:conf/edbtw/GreenT06` – a database where each provenance token has an independent probability, which is in turned used to determine probabilities of existence of specific tuples. Setting Probabilities ---------------------- Assign a probability to each input tuple's provenance token using :sqlfunc:`set_prob`: .. code-block:: postgresql SELECT set_prob(provenance(), 0.8) FROM mytable WHERE id = 1; Or in bulk, from a column of the table itself: .. code-block:: postgresql SELECT set_prob(provenance(), reliability) FROM sightings; Probabilities must be in the range ``[0, 1]``. To read back a stored probability with :sqlfunc:`get_prob`: .. code-block:: postgresql SELECT get_prob(provenance()) FROM mytable; Computing Query Probabilities ------------------------------ Use :sqlfunc:`probability_evaluate` to evaluate the probability that a query result holds, given the assigned input probabilities: .. code-block:: postgresql SELECT person, probability_evaluate(provenance()) AS prob FROM suspects; The function accepts an optional second argument specifying the computation method, and an optional third argument for method-specific parameters. Computation Methods ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ ``'independent'`` Exact computation assuming all input tokens are mutually independent. Fails with an error if the circuit is not independent: .. code-block:: postgresql SELECT probability_evaluate(provenance(), 'independent') FROM suspects; ``'possible-worlds'`` Exact computation by exhaustive enumeration of all possible worlds. Exponential in the number of provenance tokens; practical only for small circuits: .. code-block:: postgresql SELECT probability_evaluate(provenance(), 'possible-worlds') FROM suspects; ``'monte-carlo'`` Approximate computation by random sampling. The third argument sets the number of samples (default: 1000): .. code-block:: postgresql SELECT probability_evaluate(provenance(), 'monte-carlo', '10000') FROM suspects; ``'tree-decomposition'`` Exact computation via a tree decomposition of the Boolean circuit :cite:`DBLP:journals/mst/AmarilliCMS20`. Built-in; no external tool required. Fails if the treewidth exceeds the maximum supported value: .. code-block:: postgresql SELECT probability_evaluate(provenance(), 'tree-decomposition') FROM suspects; ``'compilation'`` Exact computation by first compiling the circuit to a d-DNNF using an external tool, then evaluating the d-DNNF. The third argument names the tool: ``'d4'`` (by default), ``'c2d'``, ``'dsharp'``, or ``'minic2d'``: .. code-block:: postgresql SELECT probability_evaluate(provenance(), 'compilation', 'd4') FROM suspects; The tool must be installed and accessible in the PostgreSQL server's PATH. ``'weightmc'`` Approximate weighted model counting using the external ``weightmc`` tool: .. code-block:: postgresql SELECT probability_evaluate(provenance(), 'weightmc') FROM suspects; Default strategy (no second argument) ProvSQL tries each method in order until one succeeds: 1. **Independent evaluation** – used if the circuit is independent. 2. **Tree decomposition** – used if the treewidth is within the supported limit. 3. **Compilation with** ``d4`` – used as a final fallback; requires ``d4`` to be installed. Expected Values of Aggregates ------------------------------- For aggregate queries over a probabilistic table, the :sqlfunc:`expected` function computes the expected value of the aggregate result. It supports ``COUNT``, ``SUM``, ``MIN``, and ``MAX``: .. code-block:: postgresql SELECT dept, expected(COUNT(*)) AS expected_count, expected(SUM(salary)) AS expected_salary FROM employees GROUP BY dept; An optional second argument specifies a provenance condition for computing a *conditional* expectation E[aggregate | condition]. For instance, to compute the expected count within each group conditioned on the group existing (i.e., its provenance being true): .. code-block:: postgresql SELECT dept, expected(COUNT(*), provenance()) AS conditional_count FROM employees GROUP BY dept; Without the second argument, the expectation is unconditional. With it, the result is normalized by the probability of the condition. HAVING with Probabilities -------------------------- ``HAVING`` clauses are partially supported in the probabilistic setting. The following aggregate functions in ``HAVING`` are handled: ``COUNT``, ``SUM``, ``AVG``, ``MIN``, ``MAX``: .. code-block:: postgresql SELECT dept, probability_evaluate(provenance()) FROM employees GROUP BY dept HAVING COUNT(*) > 2; Independent Tuples and Block-Independent Databases ---------------------------------------------------- ProvSQL assumes all input provenance tokens are *independent*. Since by default, provenance tokens are assigned fresh to each tuple on base tables, correlation between tuples is not modelled. If you need correlated probabilities, model them explicitly by coding the correlations with queries, the resulting tables will have correlated tuples. A common case of correlated data is a *block-independent database*, where tuples are grouped into mutually-exclusive blocks (exactly one tuple per block is assumed to be true). :sqlfunc:`repair_key` restructures the provenance circuit to enforce this mutual exclusivity: it takes a table and a key attribute, and rewrites each group of tuples sharing the same key value into independent, mutually-exclusive alternatives. .. code-block:: postgresql CREATE TABLE weather(context VARCHAR, weather VARCHAR, ground VARCHAR, p FLOAT); INSERT INTO weather VALUES ('day1', 'rain', 'wet', 0.35), ('day1', 'rain', 'dry', 0.05), ('day1', 'no rain', 'wet', 0.10), ('day1', 'no rain', 'dry', 0.50); -- Make tuples with the same context mutually exclusive SELECT repair_key('weather', 'context'); -- Assign probabilities and evaluate SELECT set_prob(provenance(), p) FROM weather; SELECT ground, ROUND(probability_evaluate(provenance())::numeric, 3) AS prob FROM (SELECT ground FROM weather GROUP BY ground) t;